Prikazani su postovi s oznakom stiffness. Prikaži sve postove
Prikazani su postovi s oznakom stiffness. Prikaži sve postove

Free vibrations of one-degree-of-freedom systems with viscous damping



Now we’re are going to analyze the system which has block of mass m, spring with stiffness k and the damper (dashpot) with coefficient of viscous damping c. The system is shown in next figure.
 
Figure 1 – a) System with block of mass m attached to the spring with stiffness k and the damper with coefficient of viscous damping c b) Free body diagram showing external and effective forces which act on the block of mass m.

As you can see from the previous figure we have derived the FBD diagram and showed which forces act on the body. The external forces that act on the body are the spring force, damping force and the gravity. The effective force is the inertial force which acts in opposite direction to the spring force and the damping force. Now it’s time, using the second Newton’s law to derive the differential equation of the analyzed system.
$$\begin{align} & +\downarrow \sum{{{F}_{y}}}=m\ddot{x}, \\ & -k\left( x+\Delta \right)-c\dot{x}+mg=m\ddot{x}, \\ & mg=k\Delta , \\ & -kx-k\Delta -c\dot{x}+k\Delta =m\ddot{x}, \\ & m\ddot{x}+kx+c\dot{x}=0 \\ \end{align}$$
                                                        


The general form of the differential equation for the displacement of a particle in a one-degree-of freedom linear system where viscous damping is present is
$$m\ddot{x}+c\dot{x}+kx=0$$
                                                                

Let’s assume the solution of the previous system in the following form:
$$x(t)=C{{e}^{ht}}$$
                                                                    

Now we need to derive the first and second derivative of the assumed solution:
$$\begin{align} & \dot{x}(t)=Ch{{e}^{ht}}, \\ & \ddot{x}(t)=C{{h}^{2}}{{e}^{ht}}. \\ \end{align}$$
                                                                  

                                        
Insert those derivatives into the differential equation:
$$\begin{align} & mC{{h}^{2}}{{e}^{ht}}+cCh{{e}^{ht}}+kC{{e}^{ht}}=0, \\ & m{{h}^{2}}+ch+k=0 \\ \end{align}$$
                                                     

As you can see we have transformed the differential equation into quadratic equation. So now we need to find the solution of the quadratic equation. The solution can be written in the following form:
$${{h}_{1,2}}=\frac{-c\pm \sqrt{{{c}^{2}}-4mk}}{2m}=-\frac{c}{2m}\pm \sqrt{{{\left( \frac{c}{2m} \right)}^{2}}-\frac{k}{m}}$$
                                         

If we write the purposed solution as:
$$\begin{align} & {{x}_{1}}(t)={{C}_{1}}{{e}^{{{h}_{1}}t}},{{x}_{2}}\left( t \right)={{C}_{2}}{{e}^{{{h}_{2}}t}}, \\ & x(t)={{x}_{1}}(t)+{{x}_{2}}(t), \\ & x(t)={{C}_{1}}{{e}^{{{h}_{1}}t}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{{{h}_{2}}t}}. \\ \end{align}$$
                                                       
Then we get:
$$x(t)={{C}_{1}}{{e}^{\left\{ -\frac{c}{2m}+\sqrt{{{\left( \frac{c}{2m} \right)}^{2}}-\frac{k}{m}} \right\}t}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{\left\{ -\frac{c}{2m}-\sqrt{{{\left( \frac{c}{2m} \right)}^{2}}-\frac{k}{m}} \right\}t}}$$
                                          

The next step is to derive formulas for critical damping and the damping ration. Let’s look at the discriminant of quadratic equation.
$$\begin{align} & {{\left( \frac{{{c}_{c}}}{2m} \right)}^{2}}-\frac{k}{m}=0, \\ & \frac{{{c}_{c}}}{2m}=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}, \\ & {{c}_{c}}=2m\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}=2\sqrt{\frac{k{{m}^{2}}}{m}}=2\sqrt{km}, \\ & {{c}_{c}}=2m{{\omega }_{n}} \\ \end{align}$$
                                                    

For every damped system the damping ration is defined as the ration of the damping constant to the critical damping constant:
$$\varsigma =\frac{c}{{{c}_{c}}}$$
                                                                        

Now we need to derive the damping ratio and the first variable of determinant.
$$\frac{{{c}_{c}}}{2m}=\frac{c}{{{c}_{c}}}\frac{{{c}_{c}}}{2m}=\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}$$
                                                              

When we insert previously defined expressions into the solution of the quadratic equation we will get:
$$\begin{align} & {{h}_{1,2}}=-\frac{c}{2m}\pm \sqrt{{{\left( \frac{c}{2m} \right)}^{2}}-\frac{k}{m}} \\ & {{h}_{1,2}}=-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}\pm \sqrt{{{\left( \zeta {{\omega }_{n}} \right)}^{2}}-{{\omega }_{n}}^{2}} \\ & {{h}_{1,2}}=\left( -\zeta \pm \sqrt{{{\zeta }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}} \\ \end{align}$$
                                                       

Inserting the constant h into the assumed solution of the differential equation we will get:
$$x(t)={{C}_{1}}{{e}^{\left( -\zeta +\sqrt{{{\zeta }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{\left( -\zeta -\sqrt{{{\zeta }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}$$
                                                

The nature of the roots h1 and h2 and the behavior of previous solution depends on the magnitude of damping. So now we need to examine those cases.
FIRST CASE – The system is underdamped and has these conditions:
$$\varsigma <1,c<{{c}_{c}}\text{ or }\frac{c}{2m}<\sqrt{k/m}$$                                                        
For these conditions the expression under the square root is negative and we can write the solutions h1 and h2 as:
$$\begin{align} & {{h}_{1}}=\left( -\zeta +i\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}} \right){{\omega }_{n}}, \\ & {{h}_{2}}=\left( -\zeta -i\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}} \right){{\omega }_{n}} \\ \end{align}$$
                                                          

And the assumed solution can be written in the following form:
$$\begin{align} & x(t)={{C}_{1}}{{e}^{\left( -\zeta +i\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{\left( -\zeta -i\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}} \\ & \text{ }={{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\left\{ {{C}_{1}}{{e}^{i\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{-i\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t}} \right\}, \\ & \text{ }={{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\left\{ \left( {{C}_{1}}+{{C}_{2}} \right)\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t+i\left( {{C}_{1}}-{{C}_{2}} \right)\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t \right\}, \\ & \text{ }={{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\left\{ {{{{C}'}}_{1}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t \right\}, \\ & \text{ }={{X}_{0}}{{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\sin \left( \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t+{{\phi }_{0}} \right), \\ & \text{ }=X{{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\cos \left( \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t-\phi \right). \\ \end{align}$$
.
Now we need to determine the arbitrary constants form the initial conditions.
For the initial conditions:
$$\begin{align} & x(0)={{x}_{0}}, \\ & \dot{x}(0)={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ \end{align}$$
                                                                     

we have:
$$\begin{align} & x(t)={{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\left\{ {{{{C}'}}_{1}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t \right\}, \\ & \dot{x}(t)=-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}{{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\left\{ {{{{C}'}}_{1}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t \right\}+ \\ & {{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\left\{ -{{{{C}'}}_{1}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t \right\}, \\ & x(0)={{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}0}}\left\{ {{{{C}'}}_{1}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}0+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}0 \right\}={{x}_{0}}, \\ & {{{{C}'}}_{1}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}0={{x}_{0}}, \\ & {{{{C}'}}_{1}}={{x}_{0}}, \\ & \dot{x}(0)=-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}{{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}0}}\left\{ {{{{C}'}}_{1}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}0+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}0 \right\}+ \\ & {{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}0}}\left\{ -{{{{C}'}}_{1}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}0+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}0 \right\}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}} \\ & -\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}{{{{C}'}}_{1}}+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ & -\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}+i{{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ & {{{{C}'}}_{2}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}} \\ & {{{{C}'}}_{2}}=\frac{{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}}{\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}} \\ \end{align}$$
.
And hence the solution becomes:
$$x(t)={{e}^{-\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}t}}\left\{ {{x}_{0}}\cos \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t+\frac{{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}}{\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}}\sin \sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}t \right\},$$
                             

The other two constants X,ϕ can be determine from:
$$\begin{align} & X={{X}_{0}}=\sqrt{{{\left( {{{{C}'}}_{1}} \right)}^{2}}+{{\left( {{{{C}'}}_{2}} \right)}^{2}}} \\ & X=\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}+{{\left( \frac{{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+\zeta {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}}{\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}} \right)}^{2}}}=\frac{\sqrt{x_{0}^{2}\omega _{n}^{2}+\dot{x}_{0}^{2}+2{{x}_{0}}{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}}}{\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}}, \\ & {{\phi }_{0}}={{\tan }^{-1}}\left( \frac{{{{{C}'}}_{1}}}{{{{{C}'}}_{2}}} \right)={{\tan }^{-1}}\left( \frac{{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}}{{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}} \right), \\ & \phi ={{\tan }^{-1}}\left( \frac{{{{{C}'}}_{2}}}{{{{{C}'}}_{1}}} \right)={{\tan }^{-1}}\left( \frac{{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}}{{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{1-{{\zeta }^{2}}}} \right), \\ \end{align}$$
x .
The following expression:
$${{\omega }_{d}}=\sqrt{1-{{\varsigma }^{2}}}{{\omega }_{n}}$$
                                                                 

is called the frequency of damped vibration. It can be seen that the frequency of damped vibration is always less than the natural frequency. The decrease in the frequency of damped vibration with increasing amount of damping is shown graphically in next figure.
Figure 2- Variation of ωd with damping


SECOND CASE – Critically damped system which has the following conditions:
$$\zeta =1,c={{c}_{c}},\frac{c}{2m}=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}$$
                                                           

In this case the two roots h1 and h2 are equal:
$${{h}_{1}}={{h}_{2}}=-\frac{{{c}_{c}}}{2m}=-{{\omega }_{n}}$$
                                                            

Because of the repeated roots, the solution is reduced to:
$$x(t)=({{C}_{1}}+{{C}_{2}}t){{e}^{-{{\omega }_{n}}t}}$$
                                                             

The application of the initial conditions:
$$\begin{align} & x(0)={{x}_{0}}, \\ & \dot{x}(0)={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ \end{align}$$
                                                                     

for this case gives:
$$\begin{align} & x(t)=({{C}_{1}}+{{C}_{2}}t){{e}^{-{{\omega }_{n}}t}} \\ & \dot{x}(t)=-{{\omega }_{n}}\left( {{C}_{1}}+{{C}_{2}}t \right){{e}^{-{{\omega }_{n}}t}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{-{{\omega }_{n}}t}} \\ & x(0)=({{C}_{1}}+{{C}_{2}}0){{e}^{-{{\omega }_{n}}0}}={{x}_{0}} \\ & {{C}_{1}}={{x}_{0}}, \\ & \dot{x}(0)=-{{\omega }_{n}}\left( {{x}_{0}}+{{C}_{2}}0 \right){{e}^{-{{\omega }_{n}}0}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{-{{\omega }_{n}}0}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ & -{{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}+{{C}_{2}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}} \\ & {{C}_{2}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+{{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}} \\ \end{align}$$
.
And the solution becomes:
$$x(t)=\left( {{x}_{0}}+\left( {{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+{{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}} \right) \right)t{{e}^{-{{\omega }_{n}}t}}$$
                                                      

It can be seen that the motion represented in previous equation is non-periodic.
Figure 3 –Critically damped system



THIRD CASE – Overdamped system:
$$\varsigma >1,c>{{c}_{c}},\frac{c}{2m}>\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}$$
                                                           

As
$$\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}>0$$
                                                                    

then the roots h1 and h2 are real and distinct and are given by:
$$\begin{align} & {{h}_{1}}=\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}<0 -="" align="" class="MTDisplayEquation" div="" end="" h="" left="" n="" omega="" right="" sqrt="" varsigma="">                                                         

In this case the solution can be expressed as:
$$x(t)={{C}_{1}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}$$
                                                

As before, we need to apply the initial condition in order to determine the constants of integration C1 and C2.
$$\begin{align} & x(t)={{C}_{1}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}, \\ & \dot{x}(t)={{C}_{1}}\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}+{{C}_{2}}\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}t}}, \\ & x(0)={{C}_{1}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}0}}+{{C}_{2}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}0}}={{x}_{0}}, \\ & {{C}_{1}}+{{C}_{2}}={{x}_{0}}\Rightarrow {{C}_{1}}={{x}_{0}}-{{C}_{2}}, \\ & \dot{x}(0)={{C}_{1}}\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}0}}+{{C}_{2}}\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}{{e}^{\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}0}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ & {{C}_{1}}\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}+{{C}_{2}}\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ & \left( {{x}_{0}}-{{C}_{2}} \right)\left( -\varsigma +\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}+{{C}_{2}}\left( -\varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right){{\omega }_{n}}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ & -\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}+{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}+\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}{{C}_{2}}-{{C}_{2}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}-\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}{{C}_{2}}-{{C}_{2}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}, \\ & -2{{C}_{2}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}={{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}-{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}+\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}, \\ & 2{{C}_{2}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}=-{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}+{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}-\varsigma {{\omega }_{n}}{{x}_{0}}, \\ & {{C}_{2}}=-\frac{{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\left( \varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right)+{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}}{2{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}}, \\ & {{C}_{1}}={{x}_{0}}+\frac{{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\left( \varsigma -\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1} \right)+{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}}{2{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}}=\frac{2{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}-2{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}+{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\varsigma +{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}}{2{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}}, \\ & {{C}_{1}}=\frac{{{x}_{0}}{{\omega }_{n}}\varsigma +{{{\dot{x}}}_{0}}}{2{{\omega }_{n}}\sqrt{{{\varsigma }^{2}}-1}} \\ \end{align}$$
.

Previous equation shows that the motion is aperiodic regardless of the initial conditions imposed on the system. Since h1 and h2 are both negative, the motion diminishes exponentially with time.

Undaped Forced Vibration



Let’s consider a system which consists of block with mass m and spring with stiffness k. On the block acts a force F and this force can be represented by the following equation.
$$F={{F}_{0}}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t$$
This is a periodic force which has an amplitude of F and forcing frequency ω. The free body diagram for the block when it’s displaced a distance x is shown in next figure.

By applying the second Newton’s law we have:
$$\begin{align} & \sum{{{F}_{x}}=m{{a}_{x}}} \\ & {{F}_{0}}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t-kx=m\ddot{x}, \\ & m\ddot{x}+kx={{F}_{0}}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t \\ \end{align}$$
If we divide the previous differential equation with m we will get:
$$\ddot{x}+\frac{k}{m}x=\frac{{{F}_{0}}}{m}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t$$
This equation is a nonhomogeneous-second order differential equation. The general solution consists of a homogenous and particular solution.
We will get homogenous solution of the differential equation by assuming solution of the following differential equation:
$$\ddot{x}+\omega _{n}^{2}x=0$$
In the previous differential equation the ω is the natural frequency of the system and it can be determined by following expression:
$${{\omega }_{n}}=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}$$
The assumed solution for the homogenous part of differential equation is:
$$x=A\sin {{\omega }_{n}}t+B\cos {{\omega }_{n}}t,$$
Now we need to prove that the assumed solution is really solution of the differential equation but before that we need to derive the first and second derivation of the assumed solution:
$$\begin{align} & x=A\sin {{\omega }_{n}}t+B\cos {{\omega }_{n}}t, \\ & \dot{x}=A{{\omega }_{n}}\cos {{\omega }_{n}}t-B{{\omega }_{n}}\sin {{\omega }_{n}}t \\ & \ddot{x}=-A\omega _{n}^{2}\sin {{\omega }_{n}}t-B\omega _{n}^{2}\cos {{\omega }_{n}}t=-\omega _{n}^{2}x \\ \end{align}$$
The next step is to substitute these values of the assumed solution into differential equation. Whit this step we will prove if the assumption is correct or wrong.
$$\begin{align} & -A\omega _{n}^{2}\sin {{\omega }_{n}}t-B\omega _{n}^{2}\cos {{\omega }_{n}}t+\omega _{n}^{2}\left( A\sin {{\omega }_{n}}t+B\cos {{\omega }_{n}}t \right)=0 \\ & -\omega _{n}^{2}x+\omega _{n}^{2}x=0 \\ & 0=0 \\ \end{align}$$
So as you can see we have proved that previous assumed solution is the solution of the homogenous part of the differential equation. All that is left is to assume the particular solution of nonhomogenous differential equation.
The homogenous part of the solution can be written in the following form:
$${{x}_{h}}=Csin\left( {{\omega }_{n}}t+\phi \right)$$
Since the motion is period, the particular solution can be determined by assuming a solution in the following form:
$${{x}_{p}}=X\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t$$
where X is constant. Taking the second time derivate and substituting into the nonhomogenous differential equation:
$$\begin{align} & x=X\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t \\ & \dot{x}=X{{\omega }_{0}}\cos {{\omega }_{0}}t \\ & \ddot{x}=-\omega _{0}^{2}X\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t \\ \end{align}$$
Now we can prove that the assumed solution of the nonhomogenous differential equation:
$$\begin{align} & \ddot{x}+\frac{k}{m}x=\frac{{{F}_{0}}}{m}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t \\ & -\omega _{0}^{2}X\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t+\frac{k}{m}\left( X\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t \right)=\frac{{{F}_{0}}}{m}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t \\ & -\omega _{0}^{2}X+\frac{k}{m}X=\frac{{{F}_{0}}}{m} \\ & X\left( \frac{k}{m}-\omega _{0}^{2} \right)=\frac{{{F}_{0}}}{m} \\ & X=\frac{{{F}_{0}}/m}{(k/m)-\omega _{0}^{2}}=\frac{{{F}_{0}}/k}{1-{{\left( {{\omega }_{0}}/{{\omega }_{n}} \right)}^{2}}} \\ \end{align}$$
Substituting expression for X into particular solution we will obtain:
$$x=\frac{{{F}_{0}}/k}{1-{{\left( {{\omega }_{0}}/{{\omega }_{n}} \right)}^{2}}}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t$$
Now that we obtained homogenous and particular solution of the nonhomogenous differential equation we can write the general solution:
$$\begin{align} & x={{x}_{h}}+{{x}_{p}}, \\ & x=Csin\left( {{\omega }_{n}}t+\phi \right)+\frac{{{F}_{0}}/k}{1-{{\left( {{\omega }_{0}}/{{\omega }_{n}} \right)}^{2}}}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t \\ \end{align}$$
The homogenous solution defines the FREE VIBRATIONS which depends on the natural frequency of the system and constants C and ϕ. The particular solution describes the forced vibration of the block caused by the applied force
$$F={{F}_{0}}\sin {{\omega }_{0}}t$$
 
Since all the vibrating systems are subjected to the friction, the free vibration will dampen out after some time. Because of free vibration dependence on time we can call them transient and forced vibration are steady –state. The reason why we call forced vibrations steady state is because they are the only vibrations that remain. As long as force which causes vibrations of the system is present in the system these vibrations will be active.